What is a Software Requirement Specification(SRS)
- A document that defines detailed system requirements
- Serves as a contract between stakeholders and developers
- Provides a technical blueprint for implementation
Why is SRS Important?
- Ensures that all stakeholders agree on system expectations.
- Reduces ambiguity and misinterpretations in system design.
- Helps in testing and validation by providing measurable criteria.
Key information presents
- System Overview
- Overall Description
- Functional Requirements (FR)
- Non-Functional Requirements (NFR)
- External Interfaces
- System Features
- Validation and Acceptance Criteria
Writing Effective SRS
- Be specific and unambiguous
- Use “shall” for mandatory requirements
- Ensure testability – Every requirement should be verifiable
- Keep requirements organised and structured
Common Mistakes in SRS
- Using vague terms like “the system should be fast”
- Mixing functional and non-functional requirements
- Omitting constraints or external dependencies
- Not involving stakeholders in the process
Summary
- SRS translates user requirements into system specifications.
- It is essential for accurate development, testing, and validation.
- A well-written SRS reduces project risks and scope creep.
Key Information | URS (User Requirements Specification) | SRS (Software Requirements Specification) |
---|---|---|
Who the users are | Defined explicitly | Implied through requirements |
What users want to achieve | Captures user goals and needs | Translates goals into functional specs |
Functional Requirements | High-level expectations | Detailed software behaviors |
Non-Functional Requirements | Performance expectations | Technical performance constraints |
User Interaction | Describes how users interact | Defines UI and interface requirements |
Verification of SRS
- Formal review (evaluated for accuracy, completeness, consistency, and feasibility.)
- Business Analysts
- Developers
- QA/Test Engineers
- Product Owners
- End Users (if applicable)
- Checklist
- Are all functional and non-functional requirements clearly defined?
- Are requirements unambiguous (no vague terms like “fast” or “user-friendly”)?
- Are there any conflicting or duplicate requirements?
- Are external dependencies or constraints documented?
- Is the document structured correctly?
- Validate against URS
- Requirement Traceability Matrix (each SRS requirement should map to at least one URS requirement, and vice versa).
- Stakeholder Validation (survey)
- Gap Analysis (ensure that no URS requirement is missing)
- Check for Completeness and Consistency
- Does it cover all expected functionalities?
- Are there missing edge cases? (e.g., error handling, alternative flows)
- Are terms and abbreviations well defined and consistent throughout the document?
- Are functional and non-functional requirements clearly separated?
- Ensure Feasibility and Testability
- Can each requirement be verified through testing?
- Are acceptance criteria well-defined?
- Are edge cases and failure scenarios considered?
- Model based validation
- Use Case Diagrams — ensure all user interactions are covered
- Sequence Diagrams — validate system interactions
- State machine diagrams — Confirm system behaviour in different states
- Walkthroughs (informal, exploratory process for understanding and feedback)
Back to parent page: Requirement Elicitation and Analysis
SDLC Requirement_Engineering Requirement_Elicitation Software_Requirement SRS SOFT3202